New Health Dialogue - logo
 

HEALTH CARE: What Grand Junction Colorado Can Teach the Rest of Us (Part 1)

August 13, 2009 - 2:23pm

McAllen, Texas, became a buzzword for high health care spending after Atul Gawande's recent New Yorker article. Less attention was paid to Grand Junction, Colorado, which that same article held out as a model of high-quality, low-cost care. President Obama plans to visit Grand Junction and see for himself this weekend.

How did Grand Junction become one of the nation's highest performing health care communities? We had heard about Grand Junction months ago, and began wondering about that ourselves. So for the last few months some of the New America health team has been studying the data, and talking to participants. We just released the case study: "Grand Junction, Colorado: A Health Community that Works."

You can read a summary here or the full paper here. Today and tomorrow on the blog, we'll l share some of the highlights.

Some of what Grand Junction does right can be replicated -- i.e. having a state-of-the-art health information technology system that many providers can access from a variety of settings to get a full picture of a patient's condition, medications, test results, and health history. Some may be a bit harder, such as forward-looking leaders in health care that have a strong sense of purpose and community, and who figured out how to align incentives and business practices so that what's good for the key players in health care was also good for the community as a whole -- including the sick and the uninsured.

"One of the most impressive things about Grand Junction is its ability to channel self-interest to serve societal interest. This is a major goal of comprehensive health reform," said Len Nichols, director of the health policy program at New America.

The case study analyzes features of Grand Junction health care including::

  • Quality over quantity. Incentive contracts between physicians and the area's largest insurer help move providers away from fee-for-service, pay-for-volume reimbursement. High quality care is rewarded -- particularly if it's high quality and efficient.
  • A safety net that not only catches but embraces the needy. A clinic for the uninsured is located on the grounds of one of the major hospitals in the community. Eligible uninsured patients who show up in the ER get transferred over to the clinic for follow up or ongoing care, with care provided free or on a sliding scale. The clinic offers them a same-day, one-stop shopping for primary, preventive and behavioral health. If they need to see a specialist, the clinic can call on a network of volunteers. The coordinated safety net reduces the cost (and cost-shifting) of caring for the uninsured. Every patient receives quality care regardless of income or insurance status.
  • Transparent performance data, peer-to-peer feedback, and information sharing that encourages doctors to collaborate and communicate. Physicians learn how much each test, drug, specialist referral, and hospitalization cost the health plan. This transparency, coupled with quality measurement, raises physicians' cost-consciousness, and, along with the incentive contracts, channel physicians' competitiveness into efficiency rather than revenue maximization.
  • A strong primary care physician workforce that coordinates treatment. Team-based care is common, and the health IT enables disease management and care coordination among multiple physicians and facilities. Primary care doctors are encouraged (and compensated) for seeing their patients in a hospital, even if they are under the care of a specialist. That promotes good communication and smooths transitions and follow-up care from hospital back to the community.
  • Innovative community service organizations that play a key supporting role in filling the community's health care needs from birth to death. Make that even before birth: prenatal care is excellent and available to benefit the next generation of Grand Junction residents.

Tomorrow, we'll look at some other aspects of what the community is doing right -- and what the rest of the country can learn about getting to high-quality, lower-cost health care faster than we might have imagined.

Grand Junction Colorado

I love your comments – “ Primary care is the core of any high performance health system. Throughout a patient’s life, primary care physicians in Grand Junction are involved in all levels of treatment. This type of continuity and collaboration between primary care physicians, specialists, and other members of coordinated care teams leads to higher quality care, better outcomes, and lower costs.” Grand Junction Colorado and places like Merlac Clinic are working hard to be a Patient Centered Medical Homes (PCMH) for the citizens of Western Colorado. The community of Grand Junction has evolved into a community that has an Accountable Care Organization they have done this on the foundation of a system of Primary care and a doctor patient relationship and they are on a journey of contentious improvement that and the quality of a full Patient Centered Medical Home.

My employees are really looking forward to the kind of access, convenience that they will get in a Patient Centered Medical Home with a doctor that has expanded hours, 24/7 cover and will answer the patients e-mail. the good news this is happen very fast in Grand Junction and already available in places like the Merlac Clinic are setting the example for our nation.

Paul Grundy President Patient Centered Primary Care Collaborative www.pcpcc.net

RMHP

As a medical administrator in Eagle County, Colorado I must advise there is myth amount the facts that Grand Junction, Colorado is a model to cure our nations healthcare crisis. Grand Junction is a model only with regard to the reduction in Medicare claims from providers. Rocky Mountain Health Plans and HMO is a major private insurance offered in that area and opertaes as a NON-proift. This private insurance is available throughout Colorado. Their (RMHP/HMO) physician fee schedules are the same or similar to the 10 or so other private payers in Colorado (inadequate to most providers), their reimbursement percentage is no better than others and their premiums are higher than United Health Care, Aetna and Anthem. So the fact that the Town and County have kept a reduction on Medicare costs is a credit to the providers dealing with inadequate fee schedules in a rural community with patients who are primary middle to low income retirees and can not afford higher fees. In my opinion it is the providers who are funding the affordable healthcare available in Grand Junction, not Rocky Mountain Health Plans and not anyone governmental entity. Ask any provider or medical administrator in the State of Colorado and not just a small sample of cost analysis to conclude their exists a successful model, with or WITHOUT governement intervention. There will be no reduction in healthcare costs without involving and possible further regulation of the public and private health insurance industry. Providers (that is the suppliers of healthcare) will not survive. Healthcare will then be offered by private health insurance owned clinics and facilities or public health. The private practioner will no longer exist. Reform efforts must include a long and hard look at the insurance payer system. The insurance lobby spends millions to deflect responsibiltiy for high cost away from their business and industry onto the healthcare providers. Its time for the disclosure of facts and less rhetoric to determine the cause of our healthcare crisis thus allowing us to formulate reasonable solutions.