New Health Dialogue - logo
 

COVERAGE: New AMA President Knows More Than You'd Think About the Uninsured

June 23, 2008 - 3:42pm

Dr. Nancy Neilsen is not the first woman president of the American Medical Association but there's a darn good chance she is the first AMA president who at one point had no health insurance for the first three of her five kids, and accepted diapers and free samples of antibiotics from a generous pediatrician.

That was back in the 1960s, when she was a microbiology graduate student, the Chicago Tribune reports. She has also been a primary care physician, an associate dean at a medical school and a health insurance executive. She has seen contemporary U.S. medicine from an unusual number of angles, and at her inaugural speech at the recent AMA annual meeting in Chicago, she put covering the uninsured as the top priority. She declared she would use "all of the power" she has at the helm of the nation's biggest doctors' group "to let the nation know that we must cover America's uninsured."

"Her background allows her to speak the language of every physician in the country," Dr. Robert Goldberg, a fellow AMA member and friend of Nielsen's from the New York State Medical Society, told the Chicago paper. 

We aren't sure exactly how next year's health reform debates will play out in Washington; we know there will be many domestic and foreign policy challenges facing the next president, whoever he may be. We look forward to hearing the AMA's voice loud and clear, keeping attention focused on the families, like Neilsen's 40 years ago, who need more from our health care system than the kindest of pediatricians can provide.

Sorry, your headline for

Sorry, your headline for this blog entry is way too sanguine. The AMA has little credibility on the distribution of health care, where its "closed shop" practices and its broad contempt for the public are unrivaled by any other line of work. Dr. Neilsen's rhetorical popcorn aside, does anyone seriously doubt that if the AMA insisted on medical purchasing parity for all Americans, policy makers would hop to? The trick to AMA chiefdom appears to be to pay lip service to commonsense notions of human decency, while fighting tooth and nail to prevent their being effected.

The AMA has little

The AMA has little credibility on the distribution of health care, where its "closed shop" practices and its broad contempt for the public are unrivaled by any other line of work. Dr. Neilsen's rhetorical popcorn aside, does anyone seriously doubt that if the AMA insisted on medical purchasing parity for all Americans, policy makers would hop to? The trick to AMA chiefdom appears to be to pay lip service to commonsense notions of human decency, while fighting tooth and nail to prevent their being effected.