New Health Dialogue - logo
 

COSTS: More Florida Hospitals Seek Payments Up Front

August 27, 2008 - 3:36pm

Cash or charge?

That seems to be the question on the minds of more and more nonprofit hospitals, who are asking even insured patients to pay up front for their share of nonemergency treatment—anything from an elective cosmetic procedure to a scheduled cardiac catheterization test.

The Wall Street Journal took a look at this trend, focusing on cancer patients and chemotherapy, back in April and today the South Florida Sun Sentinel examines how the payment pattern is playing out in Florida.

Hospitals argue that rising health care costs and hard economic times have caused an explosion in care for which they are not paid. An IRS survey in 2006 found that 14 percent of 481 nonprofit U.S. hospitals required patients either pay or work out a payment plan before admission.

According to the Florida Hospital Association, state hospitals spent $2.4 billion on uncompensated care in 2006, up 73 percent from 2000. About 3.7 million people—21 percent of Florida’s population—were uninsured, adding to the hospitals’ burden of uncompensated care. And the state hospital association also told the paper that Florida has a “number of visitors” who use the state’s health services and leave, a sort of medical equivalent of the hit and run.

But patient advocates decry the practice of asking for payment before care is delivered, particularly with little advance notice for a patient who is may be facing life-threatening illness. "Somebody facing a catastrophic illness and having to be burdened with the extra stress of paying a co-pay or premium is just unconscionable," Laura Goodhue, executive director of Florida CHAIN, a consumer-health advocacy organization based in Palm Beach Gardens, told the newspaper.

Without comprehensive reform aimed at slowing down health care costs, the problem is unlikely to go away. As costs continue to rise, patients shoulder a larger share of the cost of their own treatment. And the hospitals want the payment sooner rather than later—or never.

Comments

This is the abysmal

This is the abysmal situation I have addressed elsewhere and am now called to comment here. This is not a welcomed trend, imo.

The people least able to accommodate the upfront demand by hospitals are the uninsured. Yet, hospitals and their parent systems are dodging the logic that the uninsured who pool themselves in an association like or club entity should somehow not qualify for nor be extended the similar purchasing leverage of health plans to which they routinely extend aggressive price concessions (aka discounts, or other allowances).

Just review the current price transparency in the public domain. The net to gross relationship of charges to net payments or collections puts the "real payment level" in the $.20 to $.40 cent range. In other words, hospitals are accepting as payment in full (including contractually required cost sharing), a 20 cent or maximum 40 cent dollar from Aetna, United, Kaiser (where they outsource), the Blues, etc. Yet, the uninsured, well they get stuck with charges and perhaps a "cash discount" (from an inflated charge basis) of perhaps 25%; and usually only after the shame of begging for such consideration!

Good grief, if anything, these hospitals should be bending over backwards (especially the so-called "non-profits) to proactively serve the uninsured via comparable (most favored nations pricing), and budget friendly time payments, with ALL upfront payments waived, to "earn" their tax exemption by actually providing a community benefit.

Mergers, consolidations and takeouts have only increased hospital asset market concentration and driven prices UP. The ostensible benefits of these mergers have not panned out, and this is a symptom of the balance tipping away from the interests of consumers, while favoring the pigs at the health care trough.