Higher Ed Watch - logo
 

A "Key" Victory for Students

March 10, 2009 - 3:30pm

It appears that KeyBank's predatory private student loan practices are finally catching up with the company.

Late last month, the bank settled a lawsuit filed by 51 former students from TAB Express International, a defunct flight school in northern Florida, who had accused the lender of colluding with the school to defraud them. The settlement puts an end to the case, which was scheduled to go to trial before a jury this week in a state circuit court in Florida.

Meanwhile, according to a U.S Senator in Florida, the FBI and a group of state attorneys general are investigating the exclusive lending arrangements that KeyBank had with TAB Express and Silver State Helicopters, a Nevada-based chain that shut down suddenly on Super Bowl Sunday last year.

As we have reported previously, there has been in recent years a proliferation of unlicensed and unaccredited trade schools that do not participate in the federal student aid programs and therefore go largely unregulated. Their growth has been fueled by lenders that have "partnered" with these institutions to provide expensive private loans to the at-risk students these schools tend to attract. The lenders have then turned around and, like subprime mortgage providers, securitized the loans, shifting these high-risk loans onto unsuspecting investors.

One of the most aggressive players in this arena has been KeyBank, which has formed exclusive arrangements with dozens of unlicensed trade schools -- particularly ones that focus on computer training and flight training. These schools have required their students to pay for the full cost of their programs up front, with tens of thousands of dollars of private loans from KeyBank. Unfortunately, many of these schools have shut down without warning, leaving their students in the lurch -- heavily indebted with expensive private loans and little to no practical training.

In case after case, KeyBank has fought vigorously (and often successfully) to force students to pay back these loans. In doing so, the lender has denied borrowers basic protections that are in federal law to protect borrowers from being scammed.  For example, the bank has routinely omitted from the promissory notes for its private loans a required notice that asserts the borrowers' right to have their loans canceled if a school with which it has "a referring relationship" closes down, is not licensed, or engages in fraud. In addition, the bank has tried to prevent students whose schools have shut down from challenging their loan agreements in court.

A Big Victory for Students

In June 2005, TAB Express International shut its doors without notice after KeyBank ended its three-year relationship with the school. Prior to that, KeyBank and TAB had an exclusive arrangement in which the school required students to pay the full cost of attendance -- which was around $100,000 -- with private loans from the lender before classes even started. The bank sent the money directly to the school.  According to the former students' lawsuit, the students were told that their loans would be forgiven after they completed the training and worked for TAB's airline for a period of time.

But after enrolling, students became suspicious. "The students became aware of a lack of available instructors, simulators, and aircraft at the flight school as the school continued to increase the number of enrollees," the lawsuit stated.  Eventually, they realized that "TAB had no airline." The lawsuit said that the students repeatedly brought their concerns to KeyBank officials but were rebuffed, and the lender continued to help market the school to prospective students.

When the deal finally collapsed, the lawsuit said, KeyBank officials tried to convince the students to take advantage of a "train out option" that would have required them to take on additional private loan debt and to waive their right to pursue legal action. Most of the students were not persuaded.

Instead, they decided to pursue a lawsuit against KeyBank. They won a major victory last year when the Florida State Appeals Court rejected an effort by the lender to enforce a "venue restriction clause" included in the students' private student loan promissory notes. That clause would have required them to re-file their case in KeyBank's home state of Ohio, which has much weaker consumer protection laws than Florida.

With only weeks before the jury trial was to start, KeyBank decided to come to terms with the former students. Under the settlement, the bank agreed to discharge the borrowers' private loans, which were worth about $5 million, and to pay a portion of their legal fees. The company, however, did not admit to any wrongdoing.

Under Scrutiny

Whether or not KeyBank wittingly helped schools like TAB Express and Silver State Helicopters exploit students is sure to be the focus of an investigation that the FBI is conducting of the lender's activities. Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) revealed the existence of the FBI probe in a letter he sent to one of the former TAB Express students last fall that was obtained by Higher Ed Watch. The letter also noted that "the Florida Attorney General's Office is also conducting a formal investigation into the matter as part of a larger multistate group of Attorneys General."

At Higher Ed Watch, we are pleased that federal and state investigators are taking these cases seriously. While justice has been served for former students of TAB Express, there are many others who are being forced to repay tens of thousands of dollars in expensive private loan debt for training they never received. Hopefully, they won't have to wait for their day in court before their debt is forgiven.

TAB express/Keybank

Yes, the students won the case, but not without sacrifice. They made payments to their lawyers for two years at much personal sacrifice and only got a small portion of those fees covered by the lawsuit. Wonderful article! It seems that banks were loaning all kinds of fraudulent loans during 2004-2005

KEYBANK & TAB Express

Can anyone explain that if indeed there was any ounce of validity to even a portion of the students allegations, why then would they have settled and for mere debt forgiveness when in this economic climate and intolerance for unethical banking practices, they very well could have succeeded in their endeavor with a jury trial IF THEY WERE ALL TELLING THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH? This is a logical question that a reasonable individual should consider, especially when all the facts pertaining to all sides have not been presented. Clearly there must be more, much more to their story...

Key Bank/Tab

I commend the efforts of the law firm that represented those students that had their loans forgiven; but my question is why is there no protection for students in such a bad situation? I am a former student of the Lakeland SSH, I was told all kind of things to get me to sign the paper work for the loan from AES, such as: "The loan would only be released in three equal payments at the beginning of each six months of the training", "We have plenty of helicopters and CFI's that there should be no issue with getting through the training on schedule", "You will be hired by SSH when you finish your training, unless we feel you are a safety risk", "If you fly every day you can finish the training in as little as ten months", "You can fly as often as you have time in your schedule","If you drop out you will only be responsible for ten percent of the amount released from the bank during that six month period per month of training",... the list goes on. I left a very good job to devote myself to my training as a professional helicopter pilot, and the most I could ever fly (because of lack of equipment and CFI's) was four times in one week. Most of the time it was only twice a week. With an entirely open schedule I could have flown at least twice a day seven times per week. But four times in a week was the max, and that only happened once. And to my absolute surprise when SSH filed bankruptcy that they had already taken my entire student loan after only five months in training. If the loan had been released as they said, then they should have only received one third of that $69,900. People can say what they want, but until they find themselves in a similar situation, they have no room to judge. What the students at TAB say happened... happened! These flight schools such as TAB and SSH are simply an elaborate scam that has been overlooked by lawmakers. People get educations to better themselves and their family, not to be ripped off and exploited.

TAB/Keybank

As a former SSH student, I just want this thing behind me. If my loan is forgiven, and those responsible for the scam are given their due punishment, I will give glory to God and it will be over. And that's all I need.

TAB/Keybank

Also being a former Melbourne SSH student, I would very much like to see student borrowers protected against the companies that require full payment, yet do not provide the services that were paid for. I gave up over a year of training when SSH closed its doors. I experienced a severe shortage of aircraft/CFI availability and even went as long as 30 days without being able to get a flight. This all points to a company not holding up its end of the bargain. What financial recourse does a student have when they are not getting what they have already "paid" for? I certainly didn't have the extra funds to hire a lawyer to drag it through a trial that I "might" win. Since they just shut the doors without any notification to the instructors or students, I was forced to obtain legal representation. I am a little confused and concerned by one of the comments above that point to the students being less than honest. Would it make more sense to burn more money and court time in the hopes that we might walk away with a few hundred dollars for our lost time? I don't think so. I will be happy if I am allowed to walk away from this whole experience with only a bruised ego, a wasted year and a payment I am not required to make!

TAB/KEYBANK

What about students that were not part of the lawsuit, but are in debt trying to pay the loan. I only used $40,000 of the loan, but was told I still owe the total $100,000 even if I didn't use it or receive the remainder of the money. Will I be able to file a lawsuit as well?

TAB/Keybank

I would certainly like an answer to Debbie's question above.

Answer to Debbie and Mr. Rob concerning KeyBank

As a general rule of law, anyone not a party to a lawsuit can file their own independent cause of action against KeyBank. There is no guarantee that you will be as successful as these students were but your chances of success are greater because they won and will be greater if you put together another group.

You may want to contact the lawyers who handled the case for the students.

Post new comment

Please note that comments are reviewed by an editor prior to publication. We welcome all relevant critiques, feedback and counterarguments, but comments that are profane, offensive, off-topic or blatantly commercial will not be published.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for weeding out automated spam submissions.