Higher Ed Watch - logo
 

9.5 Scandal Fallout in Kentucky

March 12, 2009 - 2:45pm

[This is the fifth in a Higher Ed Watch series "Revisiting the 9.5 Student Loan Scandal." The series takes a closer look at the origins of the scandal with the purpose of trying to resolve unanswered questions and dispel lingering myths surrounding it. Links to earlier parts of the series are available here, here, here, and here.]

Kentucky's state student loan agency has pulled the plug on a loan forgiveness program designed to encourage students to pursue careers as educators, leaving hundreds of newly minted teachers deeply indebted with loans they never expected to have to pay off.

According to a report in the Lexington Herald-Leader, many of the borrowers say they would have thought twice about pursuing such a low-paying career if they knew they weren't going to get the help that the Kentucky Higher Education Assistance Authority (KHEAA) had promised them.

"The loan forgiveness played a large role in me deciding to go into this field," Travis Gay, a special education teacher, told the newspaper. "I paid for my entire master's degree out of the program, books and all, and so did my wife. We were told, ‘It's something you can count on.' But then it was gone."

In an interview with the Herald-Leader, a spokesman for KHEAA put the blame on Congress, saying that federal funding for its "Best in Class" program had dried up over the last two years. But at Higher Ed Watch, we know that's just spin.

The real story revolves around the role the Kentucky agency played as one of the most aggressive participants -- behind only Nelnet and the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Authority (PHEAA) -- in the risky and illegal 9.5 percent student loan scheme.

Beginning in 2002, a small group of lenders devised a strategy to improperly grow the volume of federal student loans that they claimed were eligible for the 9.5 guarantee available on loans financed through tax-exempt bonds issued before 1993. This was a goldmine for lenders in the existing low interest rate environment (at the time, the borrower interest rate on regular loans hovered around 3.5 percent.) They accomplished this scheme by transferring loans that qualified for the 9.5 subsidy payment to other financing vehicles and recycling the proceeds into new loans that they claimed were then eligible for the subsidy. These lenders then repeated this process over and over again.

By engaging in these types of serial loan and bond manipulations, KHEAA grew the volume of loans it claimed eligible for the 9.5 percent subsidy rate from approximately $140 million in 2003 to nearly $1 billion in 2004, according to figures released by the Department of Education. The Kentucky agency made a killing on these loans, taking in $41 million in subsidy payments that year.

Like PHEAA and the Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corporation, the Kentucky agency used some of the windfall profits it received to compete against other lenders -- such as Sallie Mae and the federal government's own Direct Loan program -- by offering more-generous student loan discounts to borrowers in the form of public service loan forgiveness programs, such as teaching and nursing.

But the good times for KHEAA came to an end in January 2007 when Education Secretary Margaret Spellings barred lenders that refused to submit to independent audits from receiving any further 9.5 payments. Most of the lenders that participated in the scheme agreed to submit to the audits, which were designed to separate out the lenders' legitimate and illegitimate 9.5 claims. The Kentucky agency declined the offer. A separate auditor, Strothman & Company PSC, wrote that KHEAA's management was unable to attest to the Department that the claims were legal.

Now that the 9.5 payments are gone, KHEAA can ill-afford to continue the loan forgiveness program. The new teachers who counted on the funds, and planned their whole careers teaching math, science, and special education around the program, are petitioning the Governor of Kentucky for assistance. 

Here's hoping that the officials at the Kentucky agency come clean to borrowers, to the Governor, and to taxpayers in the state who may have to bail them out, as to what really happened.

Thank you!!!

Thank you for your support of over 5,000 teachers who depended on these benefits! We are petitioning the Governor's office and hope that articles such as this and other investigations can push the Governor to correct a horrible wrong made by previous administrations. Thank you!

KHEAA and 9.5

I don't work for KHEAA, but I think you are giving it a bum rap. I believe KHEAA acted in good faith, and they returned considerable resources to the people of Kentucky through its loan forgiveness programs. Contrast that with Nelnet, the "Godfather" of the floor loan maneuver, that largely enriched its investors or some other state agencies that spent the extra money predominantly on themselves. Also, I find it more than ironic that the Obama proposal to go to 100% DL will end up with the Feds using DL proceeds to boost Pell grants. If you support that transfer of resources -- and I do if we go entirely DL -- you should not be so quick to pull the trigger on an organization like KHEAA, which was living up to its public mission. Thanks for the chance to comment.

KHEAA and 9.5 Scheme

It is interesting to note Edward Cunningham became KHEAA's Executive Director in July, 2006. Prior to his position at KHEAA, Edward Cunningham was with PHEAA (AES-PHEAA) as Senior Executive; First Vice President, Education Services Group; and Vice President, Loan Division. It is my opinion that Mr. Cunningham was well aware of the 9.5 Scheme utilized by both PHEAA and KHEAA; and, that his selection as KHEAA's Executive Director by KHEAA/KHESLC's Board of Directors was a way to prolong the usage of the 9.5 Scheme by KHEAA.
It is also interesting to note that KHEAA and KHESLC (the Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corporation, a.k.a. The Student Loan People) operate as a unified organization. They both share the same Executive Director and the same Board of Directors. It would be interesting to know how KHEAA's 9.5 Scheme aided KHESLC's operations.
As for those who think that KHEAA was doing a "good" thing when they performed the 9.5 Scheme, just remember this: Business ethics cannot be bent to benefit the few by bilking the many (the "many" in this case being the taxpayers - our tax dollars being used by the federal government to pay for the unnecessary subsidies generated by the 9.5 Scheme!).

A "good" thing

Well said SalvatorKeller. I am actually one of the "few" who was supposed to have benefited from KHEAA's scheme. Little did I know about KHEAA's bond manipulations at the time, but now I am paying for trusting in this organization and I owe thousands of dollars in student loan debt that they promised to pay if I worked in one of Kentucky's critical needs areas.

But you are right, it cannot be a "good" thing if the forgiveness program was benefiting a few and bilking the many.