Where They Stand: Hillary Clinton on Higher Ed
With Democratic Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama continuing to battle it out for their party's Presidential nomination, we thought that it might be helpful to our readers to highlight some of their key policy proposals related to higher education. Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, has not yet offered detailed plans on these issues.
Today, we will take a closer look at the proposals offered by Hillary Clinton, the junior Senator from NY. Overall, her College Aid Plan, which she announced in October 2007, would increase federal student aid spending by $8 billion. She would finance this spending by eliminating the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) program and freezing the estate tax at $7 million per couple (instead of allowing it to be repealed).
Her plan would do the following:
Increase Federal Financial Aid Funding and Make it Easier for Students to Apply for Aid
- College Tax Credit: At the heart of her proposal is a plan to more than double the Hope tax credit, raising the maximum amount of benefits that students and their families can receive from $1,650 a year, to $3,500. Students and their parents would be able to claim 100% of the first $1,000 and 50% of the next $5,000. The credit would also become partially refundable, meaning that families who have tax liabilities that are less than the credit is worth can still receive some of it. In addition, the credit would be "advanceable" to allow families to receive the benefit when their tuition bills are due rather than 16 months later, as is currently the case.
- Pell Grants: The plan calls for boosting the maximum Pell Grant, although it doesn't provide specifics as to how high. Instead, Clinton pledges to "annually adjust" the maximum award to take account of rising college prices.
- Simplification: The Senator's proposal would eliminate the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), which is so complex, she says, that it "turns students off from applying for financial aid." Instead, parents and students could simply check a box on their income tax returns. Then the Department of Education would send them a coupon indicating what they can expect in federal grants and loans, and colleges would obtain the funds directly from the Education Department.
- Early Intervention: The proposal would double funding over the next five years for the GEAR UP program, which aims to motivate and prepare low-income middle school and high school students for college.
Overhaul and Improve the Federal and Private Student Loan Programs
- Student Loan Delivery: Clinton's proposal would eliminate the FFEL program and provide federal loans entirely through the Direct Student Loan Program.
- Protecting Students from Unfair Deceptive Practices: The plan, which was included in her May 2006 legislation entitled the Student Borrower's Bill of Rights, would require lenders to provide more detailed information about their private loan offerings and forbid them from charging "unreasonable and exploitative" interest rates on these loans.
- Providing Relief to Borrowers with Unmanageable Levels of Debt: Under Clinton's proposal, also included in Clinton's 2006 legislation, financially distressed borrowers would have the option of being able to discharge their federal and private loans in bankruptcy seven years after those loans come due. Currently, student loan borrowers mostly can't discharge their debt in bankruptcy.
Demand Greater Accountability from Colleges and Provide Incentives to Improve Perfomance and Make More Affordable
- Truth in Tuition: The Senator's plan would require all colleges that participate in the federal student aid programs to have a Truth in Tuition plan, telling students how much they will pay in tuition over the course of their college careers.
- College Graduation and Employment Rate Index: Under the proposal, the Department of Education would be required to create an accountability index for all colleges that would measure their students success in graduating and getting jobs or pursuing graduate studies.
- Graduation Fund: Clinton's plan would provide $250 million in grants to four year colleges to finance efforts to improve their graduate rates, particularly among low-income and minority students.
- Strengthening Community Colleges: The proposal includes $500 million in incentive grants to encourage two-year colleges to boost the rates at which they graduate students and transfer them to four-year colleges.
- Higher Education Cost Calculator: The proposal would require colleges to submit information to the Department of Education "about a typical range of low to high income students" in their freshman and sophomore years, and the financial aid awards they have received. The Department would then use this information to develop a cost calculator that would enable students to estimate the amount of aid they are likely to receive.
UPDATE -- Clinton has also offered proposals that would:
- Provide Incentives to Colleges for Recruiting and Retaining Low-Income Students: In January, Clinton announced a plan to reward colleges that serve large proportions of low-income students. Under her proposal, colleges that enroll more than 1,000 students who are eligible for Pell Grants, or at which Pell-eligible students make up more than 25 percent of the student body, would receive $500 for each additional low-income student that they enroll. Half of the money would be given to the school when that student enrolls to encourage the institution to recruit more financially-needy students. The other half would be disbursed when that student graduates, in order to encourage the college to invest in retention efforts. To benefit from this program, schools would be required to share data on the performance of their students, including six-year graduation rates by Pell Grant recipient status, so that policymakers and colleges can assess what types of retention practices work best.
- Boost Spending on Historically Black Colleges and Minority-Serving Institutions: Clinton pledges that during her first term, she would increase Title III funding for historically black colleges by $50 million a year, bringing the Strengthening Historically Black Colleges and Universities' budget up to $438 million by 2012. Hispanic-serving colleges would receive a similar boost in funding, bringing federal support for these colleges up to $300 million by the time her first term ends.
- Increase Funding for AmeriCorps Scholarships: Clinton's plan also would more than double the size of scholarships students receive for partipating in AmeriCorps, the national service program, from $4,725 to $10,000.


















Help me understand
Help me undertand how eliminating FFELP would save money to fund new initiatives if FFELP is cheaper than the Direct Loan program (Source: FY 2009 Budget).
Or is that assertion just more "duck-and-run-for-cover at the Bosnia airport" campaign pablum?
The author says she's taking "a closer look" at Hill's proposal--looks like a cut-and-paste job to me. That's pathetic for a think tank that prides itself in conducting "a robust public debate that does justice to the complex challenges and opportunities of this era."
Hillary needs a tagline for the elimination of the FFELP
The only thing missing here is good political rhetoric that obscures the fact that many hard-working Americans are going to lose their jobs if the FFELP program is eliminated. She can't call this "creative destruction" (that term is reserved to free-market turnover and besides, there is no creativity in government takeover)! How about "money changer regime change"? Alas, I think most Americans would be turned off at the mere mention of "regime change" (too many bad memories of Rumsfeld). Maybe, instead of firing FFELP employees outright, we can retrain them to make the widgets that were previously made more efficiently overseas but will now be made again domestically-call this creative protectionism? That's the spirit! A government of men / women and not laws! That's change we can depend on!
Hillary's bill of student borrowers' rights, how to revive
If you want Hillary's bill of student borrowers' rights to be revived, let her know by calling and sending personal letters to her Washington DC office, the legislative branch. I called Senator Kennedy's Washington office to ask the status of this bill since he is the chairman of the committee where Hillary introduced it last February, in 2007. Kennedy is chairman of the committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions and it's his job to determine when and if Hillary's bill goes forward for consideration.
Also call Hillary then to voice support for revival of the bill. All the contact information is on my news page for Student Loan Justice California. Call Hillary at 202 224-4451. Call Edward Kennedy at 202 224-4543.
There are lots of victim stories on the national site of StudentLoanJustice.org.
Lots of contact information at http://groups.google.com/group/student-loan-justice-california?hl=en
You can add your story and I am getting the excerpts together to send to Hillary. Each state can do this.
Will this stand a better chance of passing if Hillary is president or at least Barack Obama? The president still has to sign the bill for it to become legislation generally.
Cindy Warner
Student Loan Justice California
helping Alex understand
Indeed, Alex, the President's budget indicates that DL costs more than FFELP right now, but the President's budget also explains that this is entirely due to the fact that so many defaulted/defaulting FFELP loans are being dumped into DL by the guaranty agencies through consolidation. This is being done to recoup a greater percentage on the bad loans and make DL ostensibly more expensive in the bargain. If OMB costed the programs as CBO does, charging the defaulted loan to its original loan program, then OMB would agree with CBO that DL is less expensive for taxpayers. DL, without the bad FFELP loans mixed in, is ALWAYS cheaper. Cost of capital is lower and no special allowance payments. Voila.
SLM Corp. Employees - I hope they all get fired
Re Patrick Bott's comment about the poor SLM Corporation and other student debt industry employees (including him) that will lose their jobs when (not if) the Direct Loan program replaces the corrupt, expensive, and cumbersome FFELP: I hope every single one of these people lose their jobs. Higher education funding should be about students, not about paying for Albert and Suzanne Lord's golf soirees. As far as student debt industry employees being "hard working?" I didn't know it took a lot of effort to be a loan shark or a call center drone.
Why exactly do we have a
Why exactly do we have a "student loan industry" in the first place? These profiteers are just making a few (i.e. billions) off the backs of poor and middle class HARD WORKING students trying to improve their conditions. Good point, Jason, good point.
Post new comment