KIPP Moving into Early Education
KIPP, a network of high-performing charter schools serving low-income, predominantly minority students, recently announced plans to dramatically expand the number of KIPP schools operating pre-k and elementary programs.
Founded in 1994 by Mike Feinberg and David Levin, KIPP has focused primarily on serving disadvantaged students in the middle school years--grades 5-8--where Feinberg and Levin saw kids slipping through the cracks in the public education system. But, like a growing number of high-performing charter networks, KIPP has realized that many of the youngsters it serves arrive at fifth grade already behind grade level, and has begun focusing increased attention on the early elementary school years. Currently, the KIPP network includes seven elementary schools in Houston, Los Angeles, New Orleans, and Washington, D.C. Schools in Houston, New Orleans and Washington operate programs starting in pre-k. And that number's about to get a lot higher.
This week, KIPP announced the receipt of a $5.5 million grant from the Rainwater Foundation to expand the number of KIPP early elementary programs. By 2011, there will be 30 KIPP elementary schools, many beginning in pre-k, and one out of every four KIPP schools will be an elementary school. The Rainwater grant will accelerate the expansion of KIPP's early education work, and fund specialized early elementary training for new school leaders participating in KIPP's Fisher Fellowship principal training program. The expansion will begin next year, with the opening of nine new KIPP schools in Baltimore, Newark, and other high-poverty communities.
The acceleration of KIPP's early education program is an exciting development that will help expand access to high-quality early education for disadvantaged students in the areas KIPP serves, building a pipeline of quality education starting in pre-k and leading through the middle school years. KIPP's original elementary school in Houston, which uses a variety of funding streams to begin serving children as early as 3 years old, already has a strong record of student achievement, and other KIPP elementary schools are also showing promise.
We hope KIPP's and Rainwater's investment in early elementary schools will encourage more states to revisit policies that make it difficult for charter schools to offer high-quality early education programs. Most of the existing KIPP elementary schools begin with pre-k, an important strategy for closing the achievement gap early. But states vary considerably in the extent to which they allow charter schools to offer pre-k, as well as whether or not they provide enough funding to offer quality programs. While KIPP schools in Washington, D.C., get full per-pupil funding for pre-kindergarten through the District's school funding formula, KIPP schools in Texas receive less from the state pre-k program than it actually costs to operate high-quality pre-k. And some states, like New York, don't allow charter schools to offer pre-k at all (despite a shortage of pre-k spaces in New York City). States looking to build high-quality pre-k capacity could expand the supply of quality providers, and possibly attract proven operators like KIPP, by eliminating barriers that make it difficult for charters to offer pre-k, and by incorporating pre-k funding into their state school finance formulas on an equitable basis with other grades.




The Case for Investing in PreK-3rd Education: Challenging Myths about School Reform
















KIPP Moving into Early Education
Great that pre-K students will get this attention.
However, it's important to understand that unless all students at every grade up thru middle school are reading 1-2 hours A DAY at HOME (reading fiction is fine), the students will continue to fall behind.
Or else expand the school day, and allocate the last 2 hours of the school day for this kind of recreational reading.
Doesn't matter where the students read, they just have to read for pleasure daily. And a half hour a day isn't enough time, either.
It seems that students who read a lot daily in early grades thru middle school, and then stop reading so much, maintain excellent reading comprehension. It's almost like students have to read a lot early on, and continue until 8th grade, and then can 'coast' thereafter with minimal negative effect on reading comprehension (and SAT critical reading scores).
KIPP, TFA and related school reform issues
I am a veteran teacher in Houston seeking a dialogue with Teach for America teachers nationally regarding policy positions taken by former Teach for American staffers who have become leaders in school district administrations and on school boards. I first became aware of a pattern when an ex-TFA staffer, now a school board member for Houston ISD, recommended improving student performance by firing teachers whose students did poorly on standardized tests. Then the same board member led opposition to allowing us to select, by majority vote, a single union to represent us.
Having won school board elections in several cities, and securing the Washington D.C Superintendent's job for Michelle Rhee, Wendy Kopp's friends are pursuing an approach to school reform based on a false premise: that teachers, not student habits, nor lack of parent commitment or social inequality, is the main cause of sub-par academic performance. The TFA reform agenda appeals to big corporations who see our public institutions as inefficient leeches. This keeps big money flowing into TFA coffers.
The corporate-TFA nexus began when Union Carbide initially sponsored Wendy Kopp's efforts to create Teach for America. A few years before, Union Carbide's negligence had caused the worst industrial accident in history, in Bhopal, India. The number of casualties was as large as 100,000, and Union Carbide did everything possible to minimize its responsibility at the time it embraced Ms. Kopp. TFA recently started Teach for India. Are Teach for India enrollees aware of the TFA/Union Carbide connection?
When TFA encountered a financial crisis, Ms. Kopp nearly went to work for the Edison Project, and was all but saved by their managerial assistance. The Edison Project sought to replace public schools with for-profit corporate schools funded by our tax money. Ms. Kopp's husband, Richard Barth, was an Edison executive before taking over as CEO of KIPP's national foundation, where he has sought to decertify its New York City unions.
In 2000, two brilliant TFA alumni, the founders of KIPP Academy, joined the Bush's at the Republican National Convention in 2000. This was pivotal cover for Bush, since as Governor he had no genuine educational achievements, and he needed the education issue to campaign as a moderate and reach out to the female vote. KIPP charter schools provide a quality education, but they start with families committed to education. They claim to be improving public schools by offering competition in the education market-place, but they take the best and leave the rest.
D.C. Superintendent Michelle Rhee's school reform recipe includes three ingredients: close schools rather than improve them; fire teachers rather than inspire them; and sprinkle on a lot of hype. On the cover of Time, she sternly gripped a broom, which she presumably was using to sweep away the trash, which presumably represented my urban teacher colleagues. The image insulted people who take the toughest jobs in education.
TFA teachers do great work, but when TFA's leadership argue that schools, and not inequality and bad habits, are the cause of the achievement gap, they are not only wrong, they feed the forces that prevent the social change we need to grow and sustain our middle class.. Our society has failed schools by permitting the middle class to shrink. It's not the other way around. Economic inequality and insecurity produces ineffective public schools. It's not the other way around.
Ms. Kopp claims TFA carries the civil rights torch for today, but Martin Luther King was the voice of unions on strike, not the other way around. His last book, Where do we go from here?, argued for some measure of wealth distribution, because opportunity would never be enough in a survival of the fittest society to allow most of the under-privileged to enter the middle class.
Your hard work as a TFA teacher gives TFA executives credibility. It's not the other way around. Your hard work every day in the classrooms gives them the platform to espouse their peculiar one-sided prescriptions for school improvement. I would like a dialogue about what I have written here with TFA teachers. My e-mail is JesseAlred@yahoo.com.
Post new comment