Submitted by AnonymousIndependent (not verified) on October 7, 2008 - 3:02pm.
I wouldnt expect anyone under the age of 14 to rationally argue either side of this so...
You realize that homosexual persons in California technicaly have the SAME rights as heterosexuals, right? Even if Prop 8 is passed(to argue that they don't through arguements of "having the right to marry the one they love" uses premises of values and irrational thinking dealing with emotion). Both groups have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex. This matter brought up by same sex activists is nnot a matter of fact or policy on their behalf, its about values. They are fighting to change three-thousand year old practices because of their own values.
On a second note, which has nothing to do with religion and is strictly based on science, heteroseuality is scientifialy 'correct'. Men need women(and the other way around) to reproduce, that is how it is for 99.9% of the species on eart including homosapiens.
If you DO still believe that they do not have the same rights: mentally incapable individuals are not allowed to take on certain tasks, while sexuality can be assigned to genetics as well, homosexuals are denied certain rights.
Look up the word "marriage" in any dictionary.
So here is an arguement for Proposition 8 with facts that nobody can validly argue against with actual facts; vote yes on Prop. 8.
What gay rights activists SHOULD be working towards, and what many gay rights opposers and BOTH presidential and VP candidates also agrees with, is another classification with the same rights for homosexual marriages dealing with marriage(as a law term)as heterosexual marriages.
The only people I can see agreeing with the court's update, are those who put the blame of the economy on the Republics, who actually only hold 1/3 of the 3/3 of the government against the Democrats 2/3rds. Who is at fault for this? The democrats have the extra power to impliment their policies while Republicans need the votes of Democrats. So how does anyone validly state that the blame is on the Republicans? You might as well argue that Barack Obama, who was raised by wealthy Caucasians and whose family has an annual income of about $1,000,000, can connect with the average hard-working Americans.
Prop 8 Opposers are hypocrites
I wouldnt expect anyone under the age of 14 to rationally argue either side of this so...
You realize that homosexual persons in California technicaly have the SAME rights as heterosexuals, right? Even if Prop 8 is passed(to argue that they don't through arguements of "having the right to marry the one they love" uses premises of values and irrational thinking dealing with emotion). Both groups have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex. This matter brought up by same sex activists is nnot a matter of fact or policy on their behalf, its about values. They are fighting to change three-thousand year old practices because of their own values.
On a second note, which has nothing to do with religion and is strictly based on science, heteroseuality is scientifialy 'correct'. Men need women(and the other way around) to reproduce, that is how it is for 99.9% of the species on eart including homosapiens.
If you DO still believe that they do not have the same rights: mentally incapable individuals are not allowed to take on certain tasks, while sexuality can be assigned to genetics as well, homosexuals are denied certain rights.
Look up the word "marriage" in any dictionary.
So here is an arguement for Proposition 8 with facts that nobody can validly argue against with actual facts; vote yes on Prop. 8.
What gay rights activists SHOULD be working towards, and what many gay rights opposers and BOTH presidential and VP candidates also agrees with, is another classification with the same rights for homosexual marriages dealing with marriage(as a law term)as heterosexual marriages.
The only people I can see agreeing with the court's update, are those who put the blame of the economy on the Republics, who actually only hold 1/3 of the 3/3 of the government against the Democrats 2/3rds. Who is at fault for this? The democrats have the extra power to impliment their policies while Republicans need the votes of Democrats. So how does anyone validly state that the blame is on the Republicans? You might as well argue that Barack Obama, who was raised by wealthy Caucasians and whose family has an annual income of about $1,000,000, can connect with the average hard-working Americans.
-From an Independent on both sides.()