Submitted by Kevin (not verified) on July 18, 2008 - 5:33pm.
Joe:
That is terrific news. Do you happen to know if there was a Field Poll or Polls done in 2000? If so, how did it track?
I am tired of the argument that merely because the voters decided a statute eight years ago that somehow opinions have not changed and the voters also support a constitutional amendment on the same issue.
I believe that human thought evolves over time and voters do not merely "Flip-Flop" when it comes to constitutional amendments (not that I would ever concede that it is an amendment).
I believe that the voters of California have evolved since the Clinton Administration era.
An analysis of the Field Poll in 1980 would be interesting (to me at least) to read.
Terrific News
Joe:
That is terrific news. Do you happen to know if there was a Field Poll or Polls done in 2000? If so, how did it track?
I am tired of the argument that merely because the voters decided a statute eight years ago that somehow opinions have not changed and the voters also support a constitutional amendment on the same issue.
I believe that human thought evolves over time and voters do not merely "Flip-Flop" when it comes to constitutional amendments (not that I would ever concede that it is an amendment).
I believe that the voters of California have evolved since the Clinton Administration era.
An analysis of the Field Poll in 1980 would be interesting (to me at least) to read.