Signature Distribution Requirement Passes Nevada Senate
Nevada appears on its way to adopt a distribution requirement for petition circulators: to qualify an initiative, signatures would have to gather a minimum number of signatures in all four of the state's Congressional districts. (This represents a change from earlier versions of the bill, which would have required signatures from all 42 Assembly districts).
I'm torn on the question of distribution requirements. In principle, it's fair to require that signatures be gathered across the state -- a statewide measure should be truly statewide. In California, which doesn't have a signature requirement, the vast bulk of signatures come from the south. And the percentage of signatures collected in San Diego County, the hotbed of direct democracy in the state, far surpasses the percentage of state voters who live in that county.
But distribution requirements also add significantly to the cost of petition drives. And when signature gathering becomes more expensive, the initiative process can only be used by wealthy individuals and interest groups.


















Re: Nevada
I think only a majority of districts should reach qouta. Having every congressional district is over-kill.
As for collection of sigs in California. Southern California has better weather and has more coordinators than Northern California. San Diego county also has best access in the state. Every law enforcement agency knows about Pruneyard Decision and unlike other counties, local law enforcement will not side with store managers. Local coordinators have good contacts will police chiefs to protect rights of circulators in San Diego County. Many counties and cities can put their law enforcement agencies at risk to lawsuit based on misinterpretaion of trespass law.
Post new comment