Does Every Ballot Initiative Have State Costs?
Joe Mathews -
June 23, 2009 - 1:45pm
Writing at Fox & Hounds Daily, John Wildermuth offers an interesting criticism of California legislation that would require ballot initiatives that mandate spending to pay for themselves.
I've written favorably of the legislation, SCA-14 by Sen. Denise Ducheny, as a way to attack state voters' habit of approving spending without new revenues. But Wildermuth points out that almost every state ballot initiative produces some costs -- and in many cases, those costs are hard to quantify. So finding revenues for costs that can't be anticipated could be a difficult -- and complex -- task.
I'm not sure how to address Wildermuth's concern. Any ideas out there?


















Accounting Costs
What if the legislation specified that only accounting costs (ie expenses that could be accrued to the state) would count? That would eliminate the sort of indirect economic costs that Wildermuth mentions. You could then have a cap of say a couple million dollars, up to which you would ignore small budgetary costs (like those imposed by Prop 11).
Good Idea, patwater
Strong idea. Look also to the new post above for an idea from Mark Paul, New America senior scholar Joe Mathews Irvine senior fellow, New America Foundation www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/
Post new comment