The Way To Lose On Gay Marriage
Victory for gay couples is near in California, if advocates for gay marraige don't blow it. The following Los Angeles Times op-ed by Neal Broverman of the Advocate makes precisely the kind of argument that supporters of gays' rights to marry must avoid if they want to beat an initiative seeking to ban gay marriage this fall.
Broverman goes after the initiative process, arguing that a majority of voters shouldn't be able to make a decision like this. With this argument, Broverman walks into a trap. Gay marriage opponents counter by saying they support the people's right to vote on this and slam the California Supreme Court decision as anti-democratic. It's easy to see which side gets the better of that exchange. Supporters of gay marriage rights would do better to embrace the initiative and frame the debate around the word "respect" -- respect for the court's decision, and respect for couples who want to marry the poeple they love. That's a winning argument in California -- unless gay marriage supporters follow Broverman's lead and foolishly try to attack people's right to make laws by iniitiative. That's a right Californians cherish, and it's a right that is far more popular with the public than the right of gay couples to marry.
- Login to post comments


















Gay Marriage
There will always be people against equality. When the Massachusetts State Supreme Court ruled to legalize gay marriage in 2003 the towns & cities were given a few months until May 17, 2004 when gay marriage would go into effect. Of course Romney & his cronies tried everything to stop it but failed. Even after gay marriages were performed they tried to get an amendment on to the ballot until June 14th, 2007 when it was finally defeated in the State House. For those who are still uncomfortable with gay marriage check out our short produced to educate & defuse the controversy. It has a way of opening closed minds & provides some sanity on the issue: www.OUTTAKEonline.com