Mandatory Registration For Signature Gatherers?
Joe Mathews -
December 27, 2008 - 8:58am
A state legislator in Missouri, Mike Parson, is proposiing two major changes in the signature gathering game. 1. Requiring all signature gatherers to register with the state. 2. Barring petition circulators from being paid per signature. Instead, they would have to be paid by the hour.
It's not clear that Parson's first proposal is legal. Petitioning the government is an essential part of First Amendment freedoms, and any law to restrict petition circulators is unlikely to survive the courts. The second idea is not legally suspect, but it would have the effect of reducing access to the ballot. The per-signature system of payment produces far more signatures, more efficiently, than any other system.
- Login to post comments


















Singling one group of people
Singling one group of people by mandating hourly pay. That is discriminatory and petty. OK lets see if hourly pay is the fix then ACORN would never have happened. ACORN paid by the hour and guess what if they didn't meet quotas they made up phony registrations or got people to register 72 times.
If the point is going after dishonest circulators, how about requiring a carbon or receipt to people who sign. In exchange for a signature the circulator should give the signer a carbon or receipt of what they signed. This would reign in dishonest circulators because signers would have recourse if they were duped or lied to.
That's An Excellent Idea
California Screaming points are strong -- and his idea about fighting fraud is both very good and new: some sort of receipt or carbon copy for people who sign. It would require additional paper and time, adding to the cost -- probably fairly slightly -- of gathering signatures. Anybody out there anticipate legal problems? Joe Mathews Irvine senior fellow, New America Foundation www.newamerica.net/blog/blockbuster-democracy/