Ballot Language Altered On North Dakota Anti-Tax Initiative
A North Dakota blalot initiative to cut the state income tax in half has become a comedy of errors. Literally. The measure qualified for the ballot despite drafting errors that were discovered in May. Now, in a bit of chutzpah, initiative sponsors are angry that Secretary of State Al Jaeger has altered the official summary of the measure on the ballot to reflect the impact of those mistakes. They complain that Jaeger and the attorney general had previously approved a summary -- before the errors were smoked out.
Sorry, it's not the role of election officials to protect initiative sponsors from their own mistakes. But the episode points out the need for a change in the rules for ballot initiatives in North Dakota and other states: it must be easier to fix technical errors in a petition. Even after the problems with the initiative were discovered in May, sponsors could not go back and make minor edits. The law does not permit it. Sponsors could re-file, but they would start over. States should make it possible for initiative sponsors -- subject to the approval of elections officials -- to make minor fixes in a document. The secretary of state or attorney general should have to approve any changes.
- Login to post comments

















